Business Litigation - Contract Cases Illinois - Chicago business lawyers - illinois business law - trial lawyers



 

TRADE SECRETS, NON-COMPETE CLAUSES

AND DISPUTES BETWEEN COMPETITORS

When an employee quits for the purpose of starting a competing business, or joining a competitor, three types of legal claims may typically be asserted:

  • Claims that the departing employee breached fiduciary duties owing to the former employer, usually by commencing competition while still employed.
  • Claims that the departing employee breached a non-compete or non-solicitation clause that he had signed with his previous employer.
  • Claims that the departing employee has engaged in the actual, threatened or “inevitable” theft of trade secrets owned by the employer.

Carmen Caruso has represented both employers or employees in over a dozen of these cases, in which one or more of these claims were alleged.  These cases are always very fact intensive.

Further, these cases usually originate as a claim for emergency court relief in the form of a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), in which there is very little time for either side to prepare.  Therefore, experience counts in selecting a lawyer for these cases.  Among the types of these cases that Mr. Caruso has litigated:

  • Claims of theft of trade secrets brought by employers in numerous industries against their departing employees, who possessed key information about their employers customers and their suppliers.
  • Defense of claims that departing managerial employees in a nurse staffing agency commenced competition while still employed by their former employer, and that these employees allegedly downloaded all of the employer’s financial data in order to facilitate their own financial planning’ and that they alleged revealed their employer’s financial secrets to a bank where they sought financing.  Despite the ominous nature of these allegations, Mr. Caruso achieved a nuisance value settlement which enabled his clients to remain in business.
  • Defense of claims that lawyers who migrated from one firm to another engaged in improper client solicitation before resigning from their old firm.